We’re seeing some backtracking[1] from our political and religious leaders recently as they are increasingly encountering opposition to their illegal and immoral actions and/or their support of these actions. What we’re not seeing, or hearing is anyone saying I’m sorry. Oh sure, there are a few offenders compelled by circumstance or fact issuing apologies but “I apologize” is not the equivalent of “I’m sorry”. In fact, most often it’s quite the opposite.

“I’m sorry” conveys remorse, establishes that I was wrong and indicates that I’ve learned something and will do all I can not to repeat my offense. While “I apologize” is overwhelmingly used as an appeasement with the purpose of forestalling the scorn of those courageous enough to point out my transgression. Also, more often than not, “I apologize” is not for my opposition as much as it’s for my supporters, giving them a reason to continue to stand with me even in the face of my obvious misbehavior[2] without me committing to any real change.

On a side note, isn’t it interesting how often those forced into an “apology” seem to be incapable of saying “I’m sorry” even though falsification is a frequent part of their wordplay? I find this most curious.

Silence is complicit.

[1] Not as much as one would hope.

[2] Crime, lapse, indiscretion, whatever the case may be.